Pay in installments of $6.60 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Sep 25 - Sep 30
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
markise reisemobil Camping MarkiseDeine Camper & Go Markise Diese einzigartige, sttzenlose Markise spart dir Zeit und Stress. Ankommen, parken, und keine zwei Minuten spter im Schatten chillen! Du kennst die Camper & Go Markise noch nicht? Hier gibt es alle Infos! Produktbeschreibung Was macht die Camper & Go Markise so einzigartig? Funktioniert ohne Sttzen, ohne Schnre, ohne Stress. Nie wieder ber die eigenen Heringe stolpern! Sie ist super leicht und nimmt wenig Platz im Camper weg!
Deine Camper & Go Markise
Diese einzigartige, stützenlose Markise spart dir Zeit und Stress. Ankommen, parken, und keine zwei Minuten später im Schatten chillen!
Du kennst die Camper & Go Markise noch nicht? Hier gibt es alle Infos!
Produktbeschreibung
Was macht die Camper & Go Markise so einzigartig?
- Funktioniert ohne Stützen, ohne Schnüre, ohne Stress. Nie wieder über die eigenen Heringe stolpern!
- Sie ist super leicht und nimmt wenig Platz im Camper weg!
- Abgebaut quasi unsichtbar. Du hast keinen hässlichen, schweren Kasten am Fahrzeug!
- Sie ist aufgebaut in 90 Sekunden - Abbauen geht noch schneller!
- 100% Schatten - klingt selbstverständlich? Hier ist es wirklich so!
- Wasserdicht - logisch!
- Wasser läuft einfach ab und bildet keinen schweren "Wassersack"!
- Bei Wind und Regen kannst du ganz entspannt bleiben. Die Markise hält! Zugelassen bis max. 25km/h.
Ist die Markise für mich geeignet?
Grundsätzliche Voraussetzungen:
- Dein Dachträger (falls schon vorhanden) sollte stabil genug sein.
- In speziellen Fällen geht es auch ohne Dachträger. Zum Beispiel per Verschraubung mittels Adapter funktioniert die stützenlose Markise auch ohne Dachträger. (z.B. Adapter No. 06)
- Bei der Installation deiner Camper & Go Markise müssen die beiden Markisenaufnahmen, von Lochmitte zu Lochmitte, im exakten Abstand zu einander installiert werden. Der Abstand entspricht deiner Markisenauswahl.
- Werkzeug, Knowhow, oder ein Fachmann für die Installation sind selbstverständlich.
Bitte schau dir auch unbedingt dieses Video komplett an! Darin beantworte ich fast alle Fragen zu Aufbau, Anbindung, und was sonst noch wichtig ist...
Sollten trotzdem Unklarheiten bestehen, oder du weitere Hilfe brauchen, melde dich bei mir.
Ich versuche sehr gern dir zu helfen, damit du auch endlich eine großartige Markise ohne Stützen bekommst!
Was ist mit Wind?
Die Markise hält so einiges aus, aber sie ist nicht unzerstörbar.
Die Markise ist bis 25 km/h Windgeschwindigkeit zugelassen. Darüber ist die Markise abzubauen. Informiere dich über das Wetter vor Ort. Besonders an der See können spontan heftige Böen auftreten.
Die Markise darf nur unter Aufsicht betrieben werden. Beim Verlassen des Zugriffsbereiches ist die Markise abzubauen.
Schau dir einfach diese Video an.
Wie befestige ich das?
Grundsätzlich ist die Installation super einfach.
Alles was du tun musst, egal wo du die Markise installieren möchtest: du musst die beiden Markisenaufnahmen parallel zueinander im richtigen Abstand befestigen. Das ist alles.
Dafür habe ich einige Lösungen und Adapter entwickelt, die dir verschiedenste Konstruktionen ermöglicht.
Grundsätzlicher Abstand der Markisenhalterungen:
Egal für welche Installation du dich entscheidest. Du must den angegebenen Abstand exakt einhalten. Zu wenig Abstand, dann hängt die Markise durch. Zu viel Abstand, dann ist das ganze System zu sehr gespannt. Beides führt dazu, dass die Markise schneller verschleißt, oder nicht richtig arbeitet.
Solltest du ein Sondermaß benötigen, lass uns telefonieren - bestimmt finden wir eine Lösung.
Befestigung der Markisenaufnahme:
Die Markisenaufnahme und die Stofflasche installierst du vorne mit je zwei M6 Schrauben am Camper & Go Dachträgerfuß, oder dem Adapter. Hinten wird die Markisenaufnahme mit je einer M8 Schrauben und der entsprechenden Schraublasche befestigt. Diese werden dann dann am Aluprofil, oder dem Dachträger verschraubt.
Hier habe ich dir Video zu dem Thema gemacht: Hier klicken. Auf meinem Kanal findest du auch noch weitere Videos zum Aufbau.
Installation an Camper & Go Dachträgernfüßen:
Die Installation der Markisenaufnahme erfolgt vorne mit je 2x M6 Schrauben und hinten mit Schraublasche S 01.
Für die Standard Dachträger (Anschraubpunkte, C-Schine, Airline-Schiene, Fixpunkte) benötigst du die Markisenaufnahme 2° Standard. Für die Regenrinnendachträger benötigst du die 13° Spezial-Halterung. Mehr Infos dazu findest du bei den entsprechenden Dachträgerfüßen.
Instalation mittels Adapter:
Falls du mit den Dachträgerfüßen nicht auf die exakten Maße kommst, oder an einen anderen Dachträger bauen willst, helfen dir die entsprechenden Adapter.
Wichtig!
Der Anbau sollte durch qualifiziertes Fachpersonal erfolgen! Im eigenen Interesse und zum Schutz anderer muss alles sicher und stabil sein! Safety First!
Ich übernehme keinerlei Haftung für unsachgemäße Befestigung oder Eigenkonstruktionen!
Lieferumfang | Nutzerinformationen | Herstellerangaben
- 2x Markisenaufnahmen - Edelstahl
- 2x Stoffbefestigungslasche - Edelstahl
- 2x teleskopierbare Carbonstangen (CFK/GFK)
- 1x Markisenbespannung inkl. Befestigungsmaterial
- Schrauben - Edelstahl schwarz (4xM6, 2xM8)
- 2x Sicherheits-Anhänger
Leg dir am Besten gleich die benötigten Adapter, Schraublaschen oder Dachträger in den Warenkorb.
Technische Daten & Pflege
Markisenaufnahme
Material: Edelstahl
Gewicht inkl. Anbauteile: 1990g (2Stück)
Stangen
Material: CFK
Gewicht inkl. Beutel: 1260g (2 Stück)
Markisenstoff | Befestigung
Material Markise: Nylon/Polyester
Wassersäule 5000mm
Gewicht inkl. Anbauteile und Beutel: 350g (220cm) / 380g (250cm) / 430g (300cm)
Gesamtgewicht
ca. 3,7 kg
Pflegehinweise
Stoff
- Bitte stets trocken verstauen. Wenn der Stoff naß verpackt wird kann es zu Stockflecken kommen und die Beschichtung kann Schaden nehmen. Das führt zu einer Wasserdurchlässigkeit. Also: Wenn's mal regnet und man schnell alles zusammenpackt: den Stoff einfach bei der nächst möglichen Gelegenheit nochmal auspacken und ordentlich trocknen lassen.
Stangen
- Die Stangen sollten stets sauber gehalten werden. Wenn die Stangen mit Staub und Dreck bedeckt sind, können diese durch Kratzer verschleißen. Die Klemmung der Teleskopauszüge kann leiden und die Stabilität kann abnehmen. Hier empfehle ich einen besonders sorgsamen Umgang und eine Reinigung mit einem sauberen Tuch nach jedem Gebrauch, um Staub und Dreck zu entfernen. Also mit einem sauberen Tuch abreiben und sie erst dann zusammenschieben.
Allgemein
- Reinigung mit Wasser und sauberem Tuch. Keine scharfen Reiniger, Alkohol oder Bremsenreiniger verwenden. Stoff nicht in der Waschmaschine waschen.
Gewährleistung & Rücknahme
Jegliche Rücknahme und Haftung ist bei diesem Produkt ausgeschlossen, sobald du irgendetwas an den gelieferten Teilen bearbeitet hast.
Die Stangen sind vom Umtausch ausgeschlossen, sobald sie einmal in Gebrauch waren, da eine unsachgemäße Bedienung nicht ausgeschlossen werden kann.
Hier findes du die Bedienungsanleitung: Klick!
Hersteller nach GPSR
Camper&Go - Mirko Frank
Dammstr. 30
75382 Althengstett
www.camper-and-go.com
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 8 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Opened My Eyes to a New View
Format: Kindle
Excellent book. Entirely changed the way that I have looked at the origins debate. I have been a lifelong literal creationist for most of my Christian life. But, in recent years I have begun to question this view and look a bit closer at how evolution could in fact be reconciled with the creation story. And, this book has most certainly helped with this journey.
"The Evolution of Adam" is broken up into two major parts with each part broken up into several more detailed subsets: 1) Genesis: An Ancient Story of Israelite Self-definition; 2) Understanding Paul's Adam. It is from these two parts where Enns believes he can establish an understanding about the Genesis story, Adam, and where evolution could fit into the story.
Using textual criticism, Enns makes numerous conclusions based on both biblical and extra-biblical resources. Here are just a few that I have observed: 1) The Genesis account is NOT a book about origins, but a wisdom book about Israel's identity as a chosen people. Never did the Jewish people claim or believe Genesis was about the origins of the world and humanity. 2) Enns also surmises that Genesis was likely written post-exilic by the prophet Ezra at a time when Israel had lost its identity in Babylonian captivity and were seeking a renewed national identity that had been lost. 3) The Genesis creation story closely resembles numerous other creation stories of Israel's neighboring cultures (i.e. Atrahasis, Enuma Elish, Gilgamesh). 4) That Adam was a proto-type of Israel (i.e. loved by God, disobeys Gods command, and suffers the consequences, exiled from the garden/Babylon). 5) That Paul's Adam was explained in the context of 1st century Judaism and was using Adam as a mere metaphor and example of spiritual death for both Jews and gentile alike. 6) Adam could have possibly been the first homo-sapien that became aware of his spiritual nature, but hominids could have existed prior to Adam. 7) Nowhere in the Old Testament and Jewish history was Adam known to be the conduit for which sin became an inherited nature passed on to all of mankind.
Where I think this book is lacking is where evolution comes into play. Enns spends most of his time breaking down and dissecting the creation story, but spends very little time building up the evolution process and how it fits in. Nevertheless, we cannot dismiss the science of evolution at the expense of taking the creation/Adam account literally. There is wiggle room in these two ideologies to allow for both God's divine creation and scientific evolution.
Great book. Must be read with an open mind. If you hold firmly to creationism and believe it to be the ONLY way, then this book is likely not for you. But, if you are open to the possibility that Genesis is not a scientific book about human origins, then you may find this to be quite good. Enns speaks in such a way that this book is not too academic and easy enough for the average layman to understand. it is highly recommended.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 17, 2014
★★★★★ 5
Very insightful
Format: Paperback
I am a materialistic atheist and I liked this book a lot. Perhaps that is why Peter Enns lost his teaching position!
I certainly would not agree with Enns on his religious views but I found his scholarship & willingness to stray from closed-minded literalism refreshing. I learned quite a bit about Paul and his modus operandi in dealing with OT passages. I was presented a way of thinking about Genesis that transcended "it's just a metaphor" or "its just an ancient myth".
Basically, my take home messages were 1) the Bible was compiled in its final form during exilic/post-exilic times though it contains some much older material 2) the OT was written as a means of self-definition & self-explanation for the Jewish people after the trauma of exile 3) the Bible is "incarnational", meaning both divine & human (those who demand it be free of its chronological & cultural milieu are being unreasonable) 4) God can "inspire" by stooping to our level & it's unwise to tell God what he can & can't do in terms of revelation 5) the Bible has no intent to be scientific and historical in early Genesis 6) Paul is a bigger obstacle to accepting evolution to many Christians than Genesis 7) by tying Adam & Eve to original sin & origin of death, Paul re-shapes/reinterprets the story in a way that seems foreign to OT writers 8) rejecting evolution means rejecting Pauline theology for many and 9) Paul, who also re-writes OT meaning in Abraham (faith vrs law; "seed(s)", uses Adam to put Jew and gentile on equal footing in needing grace/Christ's sacrifice/obedience for salvation. Christ, as second Adam, undoes damage of first Adam for ALL (Jew & gentile) willing to accept the gift of grace. Paul uses midrash/pesher arguments for his Christological interpretations with "creative engagement" of OT texts.
Again, while Enns and I probably have very little common ground for agreement, I appreciated the book & was struck by this passage at the end:
"...the light of science does not shine with equal brightness in every corner. There is mystery. There is transcendence. By faith I believe that the Christian story has deep access to a reality that materialism cannot provide and cannot be expected to know. That is a confession of faith, I readily admit, but when it comes to accessing ultimate reality, we are all in the same boat, materialistic atheists included: at some point we must trust in something or someone beyond logic and evidence, even if it is to declare that there is nothing beyond what we see."
While I wouldn't agree totally with that statement, it strikes me as very honest, sincere & open-minded.
Good book whether you agree or disagree with it.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 13, 2012
★★★★★ 4
For those that really Want to know!
Format: Paperback
I chose this rating because of the excellence of content. This author has chosen to give us, those who are truly seeking answers to difficult questions, the possibilities in finding closure or agreement with the very difficult task of merging Science, and all it entails, with our faith. I always feel pulled both ways with ther being no logical way to blend the two, I then felt I must have to give up one for the other but could not do so. This book has helped me begin the journey of understanding what I've always known to be true but could not put together. They do work. There are logical explanations for the seeming opposites of scripture and science. It's a Very important read. For years I have wished C.S. Lewis was still alive. He i have turned to for so many things. But with so many advances since his death, I have needed new thoughts as like minded as he . There are more Lewises out there!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2013
★★★★★ 3
Thought-provoking but misses its "target audience"
Format: Paperback
First, the good. This is a thought-provoking book that takes complex subject matter and makes it very easy to understand. In "The Evolution of Adam" Dr. Enns does an excellent job on many fronts - most notably giving a brief overview of the history of biblical criticism and its importance to the evolution debate. His ability to distill ideas down to the core was impressive. If I had to recommend to someone 50 pages on biblical criticism I might tell them to read the first portion of this book. However, as I read the book I kept wondering how the path he was taking would allow him to argue for an Evangelical perspective (as he says in the introduction). In short, he does not. Not even close.
Dr. Enns must not know his target audience very well if he thinks that this book is targeted for Evangelicals. Virtually none of the positions that he espouses in this book are even close to what an Evangelical Christian would be comfortable defending. He has little regard for any historicity behind any of the biblical accounts and frequently tosses out the phrase "most scholars agree" as a trump card. He does a good job of helping understand the culture and history that surrounded the biblical accounts yet in the end the reader is left wondering where story and history actually meet or if possibly the whole thing was simply conjured up for political reasons. In the end, I think the question the reader is left with is "does it matter if anything in the Bible ACTUALLY happened?". How you answer that may well determine how much you enjoy this book.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2012
★★★★★ 5
Peter Enns "Upends" Tradition!
Format: Paperback
One cannot but deeply admire what Peter Enns has managed to produce within the span of less than 150 pages - not counting his endnotes. Kudos as well for his penetrating exegetical insights...to say nothing as regards his courage: few conservative evangelicals (and even fewer fundamentalists) will find the title "The Evolution of Adam" something that warms the heart. And yet what Enns has produced here not only is revolutionary (in a very real sense - see below) but may well prove to be one of the more controversial books on the science/theology debate of recent years.
Why so? Primarily because (according to Enns - Part Two of his book) Paul's creative use (in Romans) of the Adam and Eve story in Genesis was primarily for apologetic purposes...a matter that will be discussed in greater detail below. But we begin with Part One.
Essentially Part One (four chapters) represents Enns' understanding of the crucial importance Ancient Near Eastern influences exerted upon the biblical writers - the writer/s of the Genesis creation account in particular. Enns (correctly in my view)hammers this point repeatedly for the reader to consider - i.e., the bible (the whole of it) was not written in a cultural vacuum unsullied by the surrounding culture/s of pagan religious thought, whether ancient Sumerian, Babylonian, or Greco-Roman. Indeed, to do otherwise would have been an impossibility - somewhat like trying to walk along the Tibetan foothills while refusing to breathe its polluted 'pagan' air. None of us ever fully escapes the surrounding influences of culture - and the bible was never intended to do so; rather, God (if one believes in biblical inspiration...as Enns does) works fully within the conceptual categories of culture. Hence, the two creation accounts in Genesis come to us fully embedded with the concepts of Ancient Near Eastern thought patterns. Perhaps the most we can say here is that the Genesis accounts represent (in varying ways) the "demythologizing" of prior Ancient Near Eastern accounts: the God of Israel is not to be identified with any aspect (sun, moon, stars, etc.) of the created order.
So far so good. There's nothing really new here that hasn't been said already by any number of conservative evangelical scholars. Part Two, however, is something entirely different. Here Enns focuses his attention on Paul's creative use of the Old Testament, seeing as how the death and resurrection of Christ has caused Paul to look at the OT writings from a radically different perspective - Romans 5:12-21 in particular.
These verses have a long, long history in the Christian Church as providing the church's understanding of how sin and death entered the world of human existence:
we all "inherited" sin and death in and through the disobedience of Adam back in Eden. Not so...says Enns. And here is where his account veers off in a direction entirely different from traditional orthodox belief - for, according to Enns, Paul gave a particular 'Pauline spin' to these verses that cannot be found either in the OT itself, or in the Second Temple Judaism of which Paul himself was a part. Because the death and resurrection of Christ radically altered Paul's understanding of God's redemptive work in the world he (Paul) "found" in the Adam story an ideal explanation for why it is all Jews and Gentiles alike share in the universal experience of sin and death. Therefore, Adam's disobedience in Eden is NOT the cause of the universal human experience of sin and death (per Enns); rather, the story of Adam's disobedience served Paul's apologetic purposes...quite apart from whatever the story's original intention might have been. The true "origin" of sin and death remains a mystery, for the answer is not to be found (indeed if it can be "found" at all!) in the early Genesis account of Adam and Eve.
And here is where we encounter the book's controversial nature, for Enns' view represents a dramatic departure from the traditional view - a traditional view that has a rich theological heritage that passes directly through the Reformation all the way back to Augustine.
As previously stated, I deeply admire and respect what Enns has done here. For the most part I think he is on the right track. Furthermore, he makes mention of the fact that recent developments in biology have strongly indicated that we cannot possibly trace all modern humans back to an original "Adam and Eve." However, we knew that already...quite apart from modern biology informing us of the fact. Anthropology and paleontology had already amassed considerable evidence that proto-humans and modern humans were spread across the earth long before any conceivable Adam and Eve could have existed. Apparently, however, modern biology speaks with a more powerful voice than anthropology; thus, we are seeing a spate of books recently on the topic of whether or not Adam and Eve were historical - Enns' book being only one of a growing number. (Due to the geneologies in early Genesis we are somewhat limited in "how far back" we can place an Adam and Eve. Placing them 25 to 40 thousand years into the past in order somehow to allow them to be the true ancestors of all modern humans does a grave injustice to the geneologies that plain and simply do not allow for this sort of radical time reversal - a matter that any number of evangelicals, who have done this sort of thing, seem unwilling to appreciate. The early Genesis geneologies, even allowing for some "gaps," serve as a control against such unwarranted time expansion. An Adam and Eve of perhaps 6 to 8 thousand BC appears to be about the limit of what we can reasonably expect). In any case, Enns has raised a thorny and difficult issue in a way previous books on the question have not, and I believe his book will contribute substantially to more open theological discussion (one hopes without heated rancor) on the debate. In the meanwhile, some final thoughts.
Personally, I find it more than a tad curious that David Rohl (a somewhat controversial Egyptologist) has recently authored a book (From Eden to Exile, Greenleaf Press) in which he strongly defends an historical Adam - and yet Rohl acknowledges that he is an atheist. All this is most strange: an evangelical scholar arguing against an historical Adam while an atheistic historian argues for one! ("What fools these mortals be!")
I happen to agree with much of what Enns writes. However, I think Rohl has a point- even though how he fleshes his historical Adam out is somewhat bizarre. For one thing, I'm not entirely comfortable (despite some of Enns' powerful arguments) with a geneology of Jesus in the Gospels that would include "fictious" characters who never even existed. (I might as well inform you that my great, great grandfather was Dr. Jekyll and my great, great, great grandfather was Mr. Hyde). I don't see why getting rid of an historical Adam is at all necessary. Enns himself offers the possibility that OT Israel viewed Adam as their senior partriarch - the man who originally started the "clan." I personally see great possibilities here via leaving Adam within historical existence as Israel's original, grand patriarch.
The origin of sin and death via the Adam and Eve story is another matter entirely. Biology and anthropology together appear to just plain and simply rule it out - and sticking Adam back into the age of the Cro-Magnons and Neaderthals in order to "save" the doctrine is a clear instance of an act of sheer desperation. But I see no reason why we necessarily have to conclude that the "origin" of sin and death (if that's the right word even to use...which I'm not even sure about) can only be regarded as lost in the misty past. I think there is a possible way forward here, and even via an historical Adam, while at the same time embracing what Enns is talking about. I think there may well be a way to retain a personal Adam (perhaps 6 to 8 thousand BC), while also showing how sin and death had their origin in him...but with an entirely different understanding that is informed by Enns' book. Unfortunately, spelling all that out is - like "The Evolution of Adam" - a book unto itself. And Amazon commentary is not the place where one is allowed to "write a book" - quite apart from how lengthy my own commentary here has been.
In the meanwhile...kudos again to Enns for his truly provocative and highly insightful contribution to the cause. His vigorous defense of the incarnation, the atonement, and the resurrection is profoundly gratifying. Because of his firm stance here no one can accuse him of being unorthodox!
(NOTE: Readers interested in a critical analysis of David Rohl's "From Eden to Exile: the 5000 Year History of the People of the Bible," and why this book is of such strategic importance for Old Testament studies - scholars in particular, can easily access my recent review of this book (titled "David Rohl: A "Maverick" in Search of History") by clicking on "See All My Reviews" directly above, or by going to the book's Amazon website.
Hope you enjoy the read!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 18, 2012